Hi Marco, Thanks for the response!
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:16:40AM +0100, Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 20 March 2017, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > After taking a pause for a while, I tried to address a couple of the bug > > reports for Subsurface-mobile on Android and iOS. > > > > Right now we are building with Kirigami 1.1 and Qt 5.7.1. If we have to > > upgrade to Kirigami 2.0 and/or Qt 5.8 in order to make it easier for > > people to help us, please let me know... I tried with Qt 5.8.0 on the > > desktop and the two problems are still there. But I haven't tried Kirigami > > 2.0. > > as far i understood of the problems, the version of kirigami shouldn't really > matter, as they're related with models and stock qml listviews. > > If I'll get around this week i'll try to build subsurface again (do those > problems happen only since recently or always happened as far you know?) That's a question that should be easy to answer but oddly it isn't. We've had a few reports in the initial release of Subsurface-mobile where people were reporting the first problem (with the details showing one dive further down in the list than the one that you tapped on), but a couple of the developers (including myself) weren't able to reproduce it. But now with the current version it seems fairly easy to reproduce the problem. > In the meantime, especially since you say some problems happen with the full > app as well, No, I don't think I said that. Or I should say, I wasn't planning to say this. I haven't seen this problem in Subsurface - I can easily reproduce both problems when building Subsurface-mobile (the QML app) on the desktop and running it there under Linux. Maybe I didn't phrase this clearly enough - in both cases it is the QML app that shows the problem, not the Qt app. > I may suspect some problem to the main model of the application? > (before gets sorted by the qfilterproxymodel) Given that we have more than 10k users of the desktop app (and all of the developers constantly work on that) I am near certain that the model isn't broken. > Have you ever tried ModelTest? https://wiki.qt.io/Model_Test > Not sure how easy to detach that model to make it fully work in a minimal > application, but having that test that is normally built and ran routinely > may > save quite some future headaches. Regardless, I will definitely do that, just in case. Please let me know if you run into trouble building the current Subsurface-mobile. There is a silly cmake issue when cross building for Android. We have a shell script that should do this pretty much fully-automated (this is reasonably well tested), but with Qt5.7.1 and Qt5.8.0 there is a bug that requires a small fix to android_armv7/lib/cmake/Qt5Core/Qt5CoreConfigExtras.cmake This is explained in the comments at the beginning of packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh If you are bulding on a Linux box to run Subsurface-mobile on the desktop, you should be able to do this quite easily by running scripts/build.sh -mobile That also should build everything on a recent Linux distro. Thanks again for your willingness to look into this! /D
