2017-03-09 19:21 GMT+01:00 Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com>: > 2017-03-09 18:41 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org>: >> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 06:30:36PM +0100, Elvis Stansvik wrote: >>> I just wish the FSF FAQ was more clear on this (direct dynamic linking vs >>> dlopen()ing). >> >> They can't be more clear as the definition of derived work is set by >> legislatures and courts in different justictions and will differ. > > Ah yes, that is true. But it would still be nice if they did a > write-up on what their intention is, even if it's always up to the > copyright legislation in the applicable jurisdictions in the end. They > do elaborate on their view of the distinction between fork/exec and > dynamic linking in their FAQ after all.
In the end, I realized it wasn't really feasible to bundle Breeze inside the AppImage anyway, because of the many KF5 dependencies. I thought that the widget style .so would only have Qt as dependency, but realize now that it does a fair amount of integration with Plasma as well. Elvis > > Elvis > >> >> Also they don't want to be clear, they want everything to be GPL. >> >> Jonathan
