rjvbb added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D4929#93093, @mart wrote: > hmm, frameworksintegration? (but still in frameworks side) Bundling with, you mean? That could work too. It's not really the topic of this review request, but I discussed the idea of bundling with someone who bundles a well-known KDE app for Mac and MS Windows. I'll leave it to him to come forward (or not) but it looks we both think that KCrash would be the most logical framework. Many applications already depend on it (not the case with frameworksintegration) so done right no extra action would be required to build and include DrKonqi in binary distribution forms of those applications. More useful bug reports concerning crashers (because a backtrace is attached) for little effort, who would not appreciate that? KCrash would probably have to become a Tier3 framework - no idea if that's an issue in itself or not. REPOSITORY R120 Plasma Workspace REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D4929 To: rjvbb, #plasma_workspaces Cc: mart, broulik, kde-mac, plasma-devel, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol
