https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343962

--- Comment #16 from Kai Stian <kai.stian.ols...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Martin Klapetek from comment #15)
> > I will call that redundant information.
> 
> For every one calling that a redundant information there will be someone
> calling that a missing information if it was removed.

Yes, that's true.

> Sometimes redundant is better than missing.

What I have always liked about KDE is it huge number of customization options.
I don't mean the feature should be removed, but would like it to be
customizable so the "redundant calling" and the "missing calling" users have
the choice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to