> On Oct. 17, 2016, 4:51 a.m., Anthony Fieroni wrote:
> > CMakeLists.txt, line 47
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129203/diff/1/?file=482304#file482304line47>
> >
> >     You can't increase minimum deps only for this framework. It's done 
> > automatically for all and when it's needed. Just try this patch 
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129065/ give 'ship it' if works correctly

I see, the original patch was not enough, there are 2 usings of 
QQuickWindow::NoStage, so I've updated the patch.


- Alberto


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129203/#review100058
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 17, 2016, 1:37 a.m., Alberto Curro wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129203/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 17, 2016, 1:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-framework
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Being a newbie, following build instruction from the wiki, I could not build 
> plasma-framework on my Linux mint 18 (based on Ubuntu Xenial).
> 
> Two of the changes are coding issues.
> 
> The change in CMakeLists.txt comes from a wrong required version, also stated 
> here: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128763/. 
> 
> For Xenial, QT 5.5.1-2 is included, where QQuickWindow::NoStage is **not** 
> defined. It was introduced in Qt 5.6, so requiring Qt 5.3 won't work.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 3c0eaee 
>   src/plasmaquick/dialog.cpp eac9ee5 
>   src/plasmaquick/dialogshadows.cpp eb67926 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129203/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Building is ok now. I've had to add a second ppa for Qt 5.7 on Xenial: 
> https://launchpad.net/~beineri/+archive/ubuntu/opt-qt57-xenial
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alberto Curro
> 
>

Reply via email to