On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Eike Hein <h...@kde.org> wrote: > Worth keeping in mind that "it's only 300 msecs" adds up though, > 300 msecs here, 300 msecs there ... also it's a question of "do > we expect this cost point to become worse over time?", i.e. if > nothing it done it might not stay at 300 msecs. > > Ran it on my laptop which is running release Qt, so hopefully a bit more representative.
The fluctuations are a very high, I might need more runs to get proper averages. Current: 3.944 Current: 4.127 Current: 3.927 Cache: 3.621 Cache: 4.509 Cache: 3.623 Cache: 3.554 All in all, that seems quite good. As a perctentage that's a higher boost than on Marco's system. Having said that, the main reason the cache boost is quite so high, is because of appletprivate::init() loading through every applet's metadata - remove that and the time falls to 3.68 with no cache anwyay... David
