----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129037/#review99580 -----------------------------------------------------------
discussions in telegram really don't count, it must be somewhere inclusive to everybody and persistent. -1 for moving lock screen into startup and shutdown, it has zero to do with it, the fact that in your design process you designed it together sddm and the logout screen is just an implementation detail, which the user is not concerned with. also moving kcms for the sake of moving, is this that time of the year again? I've lost the count how many times I objected reorganizing kcms and hearing the answer "trust me, this one will be the right one" I find the related idea of "related kcms" a really good one, that should finally put a stop in the need of needlessy shuffling stuff around. - Marco Martin On Sept. 27, 2016, 9:12 a.m., Andreas Kainz wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129037/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 27, 2016, 9:12 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma and KDE Usability. > > > Repository: kscreenlocker > > > Description > ------- > > new startup and shutdown system setting group will look like this > > Startup and Shutdown > - Login Screen (SDDM) > - Splash Screen > - Autostart > - Background Services > - Lock Screen > - Logout and Session > > there are some patches to rearrange the existing kcm's. > - https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129037/ > - https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129038/ > - https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129039/ > > > Diffs > ----- > > kcm/screenlocker.desktop 17e6279 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129037/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Kainz > >
