On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:37 PM, David Edmundson
<da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote:
>> perhaps you are right, semantically they are two things, not sure what
>> could be used instead more "proper"(suggestions welcome), will think
>> more about it.
>
>
> Long term, a virtual hook for immutability?
but even adding a new virtual isn't bc as far i know?
>>
>> also, what do you suggest for 5.8? trying to temporarly unlock?
>
>
> We can try it.
>
> This also works:
>
> applet->pluginInfo().pluginName()) {
> - applet->destroy();
> + QMetaObject::invokeMethod(applet, "cleanUpAndDelete");
>
> (in all 3 cases)
>
> But it's equally messy, and has an issue that transient won't get set, so I
> don't like it.
hmmme neither, i would rather go for trying to unlock temporarly (this
could be a problem for some enterprise setups tough)
--
Marco Martin
