On Saturday, 2016-05-28, 16:05:46, kdea wrote: > They suggested me to upload the library to the "Qt Components" section of > http://qt-apps.org/ , so I did it, and the library is now available to other > developers.
Wouldn't it make much more sense to register it with inqlude.org as a central
place for Qt libraries/components instead of spreading over many sites?
> Anyway, in the debate at Plasma-devel mailing list, I pointed out two
> things:
> - Having all types of libraries in one or two sections ("Qt Components"
> and "Qt Widgets") is not good, because it will be hard for developers
> to browse/find libraries.
Those should probably filter criteria instead of categories.
A developer might be looking for a functional block, or look for something for
UI, etc.
> For the first solution (add more sections to http://qt-apps.org and
> http://kde-apps.org/ ), I would propose the following:
> - http://qt-apps.org/ :
> - Create a new section "Qt Libraries". (sections are on the left column
> of the page)
> - Create the following subsections under the "Qt Libraries" section:
> Qt 5 C++ libs
> Qt 5 QML libs
> Qt 5 C++/QML libs
> Qt 4 C++ libs
> Qt 4 QML libs
> Qt 4 C++/QML libs
Version should also be a filter criteria instead of a categorie, IMHO.
Also why make the language the deciding criteria instead of what the component
is for? I.e. is it for UI or is to for networking, etc.
Cheers,
Kevin
--
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
