On Tuesday 05 April 2016, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2016 17:29:58 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Montag, 4. April 2016 15:04:30 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > I'm not convinced performant is a word although it seems to be used > > > for computer jargon > > > > > > http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/38945/what-is-wrong-with-the > > > -wo rd -performant > > > > It is clearly jargon. As Jens already said, the question is: Can we > > afford the jargon or not? We think we can, but there are certainly also > > good arguments against it. > > I don't like it. How about "nimble", it expresses power and speed in a > positively sounding adjective.
to me nimble sounds like "small footprint" while would be a good aim to have in the future, i am not sure i could tell that around with a straight face on the current state... (and if is so contrary to the current perception it may really backfire) -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
