----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127174/#review92752 -----------------------------------------------------------
Same comment as always in such cases: if we do that we end up with Plasma installs without Breeze deco, because distros don't check the optional output. I understand your reasoning, but I think it needs a dedicated switch and a big fat warning - Martin Gräßlin On Feb. 25, 2016, 2:20 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127174/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 25, 2016, 2:20 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: breeze > > > Description > ------- > > I want to have Breeze in the XDG-App runtime, it seemed like having > kdecoration wouldn't be very useful there. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CMakeLists.txt 93ad504 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127174/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel