> On Feb. 22, 2016, 10:09 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > -1
> > I'm against complicating the effect as well.
> > I don't want every time a small behavior change gets introduced, a config 
> > option popping up to "behave just like before". Especially because it won't.
> > If the size is not animated, more logic would needed to be reintroduced, 
> > that "anchoring you did put. that's complexity hidden behind a config 
> > option, meaning effectively dead code for most developers, the road to 
> > unmaintained :p
> > 
> > for me it's either having it or disabling animations completely by 
> > disabling the effect, especially because animate move without animating 
> > resizing was simply a wrong behavior, we just didn't have the means to do 
> > better.
> 
> David Rosca wrote:
>     > If the size is not animated, more logic would needed to be 
> reintroduced, that "anchoring you did put.
>     
>     I don't think so. That anchoring is mainly for tooltips in panels, and it 
> works fine. Did you try it?
>     
>     > for me it's either having it or disabling animations completely by 
> disabling the effect, especially because animate move without animating 
> resizing was simply a wrong behavior, we just didn't have the means to do 
> better.
>     
>     It may be wrong behavior, but it looked better overall imo.
>     The current animation looks great when there is only small difference 
> between old/new tooltips, but also bad when the texture resizing is 
> noticeable (when sizes/contents differ significantly).
>     
>     As for disabling tooltips completely, that is now what you get with 
> Plasma 5.5 and Frameworks 5.20.
>     
>     Alright, I'll put it on kde-look.org instead.

> I don't think so. That anchoring is mainly for tooltips in panels, and it 
> works fine. Did you try it?

I believe that it works :) but still, it's code disabled by default which only 
function is to "make it like it was before"


- Marco


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127120/#review92631
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 21, 2016, 9:31 a.m., David Rosca wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127120/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 21, 2016, 9:31 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: kwin
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Disabling both animations makes the effect look like the old Plasma tooltip 
> animation.
> Also don't animate when geometry didn't change + don't skip small steps as 
> resize may happen in steps so we must animate all of them.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   effects/morphingpopups/package/contents/code/morphingpopups.js ce6ad86 
>   effects/morphingpopups/package/contents/config/main.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   effects/morphingpopups/package/contents/ui/config.ui PRE-CREATION 
>   effects/morphingpopups/package/metadata.desktop f9b192c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127120/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Changing config from KCM needs KWin restart because even though 
> `configChanged` is emitted, `readConfig` returns the old values (bug, or am I 
> doing something wrong?).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Rosca
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to