> On Dic. 11, 2015, 7:08 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > > Attached images directly to request; if this is not the preferred way of > > > attaching large files > > > > Attaching just one file would be fine, I mean this is just to see it right? > > So there's no need to upload /all/ the resolutions, imo :) > > > > > I would like to shift to more "professional" default wallpapers > > > > Can you clarify a bit what does that mean? > > > > --- > > > > Overall the wallpaper strikes me as a visual corruption. This may be due > > to my currently slightly broken intel driver which creates all sorts of > > graphical glitches and that wallpaper to me just looks like it glitched > > (the shadow polygon going on from the top-left corner is just a strong > > reminescence of that plus the "rainbow noise" going on at the lower-right > > diagonal part of the image). > > Ken Vermette wrote: > Ah, sorry, haven't seriously used reviewboard. Wasn't sure if the content > in the request would be what actually goes into the repo. David very > patiently explained everything I needed to know about this all, but my birdy > little brain promptly forgot anything important and I don't think I've > (properly) gotten as far as having a patch committed. Sorry - this is an area > I'm trying to improve. > > Generally when I talk about "professional" I'm talking less organic, > wild, "in your face" wallpapers. 5.2 was just horrible neon mess, 5.3 looked > cluttered, 5.4 was regularly called an "acid trip", etc... I don't want to > make things dull and lifeless, but after going down the current road I think > a cleaner approach is worth a shot. Practically this means I want to be more > conservative in the shapes and clutter department, rope in the organics a > bit, and focus on clearly defined visually interesting layers. > > --- > > Hopefully our users aren't exposed to enough visual corruption to feel > that way :P > > But in all seriousness I will move the top-left of the "shadow polygon" > away from the corner though (possibly hiding it off-screen entirely (in > certian sizes it is cropped anyway), I do regularly work on a machine with > AMD graphics w/ graphical bugs and I can understand the where you're coming > from when I specifically look for it. > > Otherwise people who have seen this wallpaper haven't mentioned it > looking glitchy, so general users may not be as sensitive to this. Consider > that I personally don't see it as a big issue, as for some "glitchy" is even > a desirable look. Before I remove/alter the circuit pattern I'd like to see > another person or two weigh in and answer if I'm biased because I know what > it's supposed to be, or if you are possibly biased from working on a system > with visual corruption. Does anyone else think; > - the pattern could be regularly/easily misidentified as visual > corruption? > - ... And would a wallpaper with that style be a problem? > > I'll wait until we decide what to do with the pattern before loading > another version (with the shadow polygon altered)
Every time that you release a wallpaper I think: "oh, OK, this is the best wallpaper ever, even the next won't be better than this!" and every time you surprise me with a wallpaper better than the previous. This time you impress me again, this wallpaper goes exactly in the direction I wanted for Plasma! It's professional, has unique style, it's an art masterpiece. I want it for Plasma 5.6. Absolutely. - Alessandro ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/#review89366 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dic. 11, 2015, 7:04 p.m., Ken Vermette wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dic. 11, 2015, 7:04 p.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: breeze > > > Description > ------- > > Attached images directly to request; if this is not the preferred way of > attaching large files, please let me know and I'll change methods, perhaps > using the VDG share if that's preferred. > > For reference I would like to shift to more "professional" default wallpapers > and away from the more organic style of 5.4 and 5.5. Feedback on both general > direction or this wallpaper is welcome. > > Note: I will submit splash files later in case of changes to this wallpaper. > > > Diffs > ----- > > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1024x768.png 60e1205 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1280x1024.png 36a9130 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1280x800.png c33e594 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1440x900.png 2c75b54 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1600x1200.png 5ddaf72 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1638x1024.png a3c7492 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1680x1050.png eddc47e > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/1920x1080.png ab6d950 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/2560x1440.png 5c78e9d > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/2560x1600.png eeb08a1 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/3200x1800.png 7340567 > wallpapers/Next/contents/images/3200x2000.png fd1a62c > wallpapers/Next/contents/screenshot.png a6d2b7b > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126319/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Dogfooded on several machines and my phone for a couple weeks now, doesn't > burn eyes out. Corner isn't as distracting as one might assume, especially > once a window is on screen. Got early feedback, adjustments made from > origional in order: > - Re-drew the "circuit/chip" pattern to be less noisy/distracting/cleaner. > Adjusted it so details are still seen on lower-res wallpapers. > - Lightened purple to avoid the "dark void" feeling people have mentioned > feeling from 5.5 wallpaper. > - Fixed minor pixel issues for triangles near edge > - Adjusted noise, shadows. > > > File Attachments > ---------------- > > 1024x768.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/5e9e5db3-c8d4-43ec-8236-da5daa80be85__1024x768.png > 1280x800.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/41e11bb9-eaef-4eb1-bb4b-c7137becaca0__1280x800.png > screenshot.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/ee643bd5-8162-4a9b-ae09-df090d4f0b43__screenshot.png > 1280x1024.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/054536c9-8160-418a-a1c9-c319e1e2b533__1280x1024.png > 1440x900.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/c4c61ba4-10ea-4d87-9437-7b7e1701eaf7__1440x900.png > 1600x1200.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/ee746ed5-428d-4423-8e20-d9786b25190f__1600x1200.png > 1638x1024.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/233a9950-24bd-47b6-8c7a-8f3e6fe707df__1638x1024.png > 1680x1050.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/4c86e45c-eb10-47fa-b1ff-736bd65918cc__1680x1050.png > 1920x1080.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/93cc544a-a8a8-4291-91ff-58140ec5ed64__1920x1080.png > 2560x1440.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/73ad5caf-5156-495b-939c-387ce4970140__2560x1440.png > 2560x1600.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/1ff471aa-2e26-41d9-8921-2c62544d3415__2560x1600.png > 3200x1800.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/7590da34-e5c5-4f55-9ac9-0a22c13a9c0d__3200x1800.png > 3200x2000.png > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/12/11/229a429e-9633-4988-ad78-dfb039583fc4__3200x2000.png > > > Thanks, > > Ken Vermette > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
