> On Dec. 8, 2015, 6:51 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2 for another reason: the display system should not be a user facing part. > > That's a technical detail which will go away in a year or two. Do you want > > to rename it back to Plasma then? If at all we should change the X11 > > session to have the name adjusted. > > David Edmundson wrote: > If you think that, why provide the .desktop file at all when it's not > ready? > > Sebastian Kügler wrote: > I think as long as Wayland is the experimental option, it should say so. > The specialization makes it easier to recognize the stable/X11 session.
What I don't get is why we're installing this file by default at all. We *know* that without a kdeinit patch everything freezes. So we've just added an option that we *know* will only give a black screen. That's both pointless and setting a bad impression. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126275/#review89235 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 8, 2015, 2:09 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126275/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 8, 2015, 2:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: plasma-workspace > > > Description > ------- > > The commit/review says it's displayed as "Plasma (Wayland)" > but the name is just "Plasma", making it confusing in login > manager. > > > Diffs > ----- > > plasmawayland.desktop.cmake c5d5757 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126275/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Sddm now clearly shows which "Plasma" is Waylandplasma. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Klapetek > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
