On Monday, November 30, 2015 1:02:01 PM CET Aleix Pol wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > there is currently a review request to add OSX specific changes to > > framework integration plugin [1]. > > > > This seems wrong to me. I think our framework integration plugin is about > > integration Qt applications into the Plasma workspace. In my opinion it > > should not be used anywhere else. Not on GNOME, not on Windows and not on > > OSX. The idea of integration is that applications look native on the > > desired platform. The plugin defines the native look on Plasma and by > > that using it on other platforms is automatically breaking the > > integration. > > > > Now I understand that some people don't like the native look of their > > platform and would prefer using Plasma. Sorry I don't have an answer to > > that. Unfortunately I think it's completely out of scope for the > > integration platform to be considered outside Plasma. > > > > Given that: if people agree with my view that the framework integration is > > only about Plasma, I suggest that we move the framework integration to > > kde/ > > workspace to release it together with Plasma instead of frameworks. > > > > Opinions? > > Hi, > I agree with you, I've proposed the same thing as you in the past, > although there's some issues that would then need to be sorted. > > What you actually want is, IMHO, to move the QPlatformTheme plugin > together with Plasma, but frameworksintegration is not entirely about > that nowadays: it has code that integrates different frameworks with > each other: > - FrameworkIntegrationPlugin: this doesn't really belong in plasma, > integrates KMessageBox with KNotifications.
agree, does it belong into framework integration, though? > - infopage: this is used by applications as well as plasma same question: does this belong into framework integration? > - KStyle: Plasma can provide styles, but this seems more like a QStyle > creation framework. maybe we need a dedicated kstyle framework? > - platformtheme: Plasma integration. There I agree. yep, that's what I actually was thinking about. All the defaults for in Plasma Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
