https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355906
--- Comment #6 from vladimir-...@yandex.ru --- > it sounds like a recipe for disaster to encourage theme editors to do this. No disaster has ever happened for software and themes that follow this convention. > What you're missing is that "themes" is a concept that makes sense to the > user, for developers and system integrators, you need the type of theme, they > can be collections of images (icons), SVGs (icons, Plasma themes), > stylesheets (QtCurve, new-style GNOME), or C++ code (Qt styles), QML (Plasma > look and feel packages), binary plugins (window decorations) which means they > need different treatment. > for instance themes of some things (Qt, KWin, GTK2, ...) are binary plugins, > that can't go in /usr/share as no binary libraries are allowed there. I'm not missing this. Binary plugins are usually part of engines, and that is completely different story. To clarify, Qt styles are analogous to GTK engines and are NOT themes. Themes are data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
