> On Feb. 24, 2015, 12:01 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > if all imports ni the repo are raised even if there is no new api, may be > > less confising? (or some day there will be a ton of different versions) > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > my suggestion would be to raise with maybe each framework release > independent on whether new api is added or not. > > Marco Martin wrote: > +1
Well then what should I do? Raise all those "2, 0" to "2, 1"? - Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/#review76537 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 24, 2015, 11:58 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 24, 2015, 11:58 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: plasma-framework > > > Description > ------- > > Now I don't know if bumping just this one is good/enough or if all of them > should be raised. Please advise. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/declarativeimports/core/datamodel.h 3b3ca75 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122696/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Martin Klapetek > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel