On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Martin Gräßlin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Friday 23 January 2015 02:41:23 David Edmundson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Christoph Feck <cf...@kde.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 22:34:18 David Edmundson wrote: > > > > I was trying to triage some of the wider Plasma bugs and realised > > > > that I didn't have a full list of bugzilla components [...] > > > > > > Thank you for taking care of bugs. Could you please comment on > > > "kscreensaver/locker-qml" component? Is this the correct place to > > > report bugs for the Plasma 5 locker? > > > > That is a very good question. It looks like I missed that on my original > > list. There's some valid looking Plasma 5 bug reports in here that I was > > missing. > > > > Thanks. > > > > We currently have these bugs scattered amongst: > > - ksmserver > > - plasmashell/lookandfeel > > - kscreensaver/locker-qml > > > > would be good to consolidate it and close the rest. > > > > Any preference? > > I would say the kscreensaver product gets closed, the still valid bugs are > moved to a new component in ksmserver. Fine with me. I've created a component, we can at least move the Plasma 5 bugs there and add a comment in kscreensaver. (Once 4.11 goes EOL the no longer > applying bugs can be closed). > > I don't see why we should have to wait. If no-one is going to fix it, there is no point keeping a bug open. I see this EOL thing as a time for which we should keep on top of all security issues and anything critical but nothing more. I guess that's a topic for an exciting flamewar another day. David
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
