> On Pro. 15, 2014, 9:59 dop., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > This spec is however gnome's own extension of the original spec, which has > > no such stuff. Is there an actual use case why this would be needed? > > > > More general question - should we be implementing their extensions?
A guy from RedHat working on ABRT asked me today if we support persistent notifications, he was looking at org.freedesktop.Notifications and checking if there is "persistence" keyword in supported capabilities. I don't see anything wrong on implementing their extensions, in this case it could be useful. - Jan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121529/#review72029 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Pro. 15, 2014, 9:37 dop., Jan Grulich wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121529/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Pro. 15, 2014, 9:37 dop.) > > > Review request for Plasma and Martin Klapetek. > > > Repository: plasma-workspace > > > Description > ------- > > According to our implementation of org.freedesktop.Notifications we don't > support persistent notifications, which is not true. This patch adds > "persistence" keyword to the list of capabilities. > > See https://developer.gnome.org/notification-spec/#id2825605. > > > Diffs > ----- > > dataengines/notifications/notificationsengine.cpp d4b7f19 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121529/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jan Grulich > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
