On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Víctor Blázquez <victor.blazq...@kde.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for doing the move that fast, I should have realized it was sent > only to plasma-devel
No worries - in virtually all cases it is fine to process requests when we receive them. > > Víctor Blázquez Thanks, Ben > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It seems there has been a recent outbreak of repository moves which >>> have been extremely poorly co-ordinated by those doing the requests. >>> >>> In addition, it is actually a requirement that modules moving from >>> Extragear into (what was at least) the SC need to re-transit through >>> KDE Review.It is also considered proper practice to at least inform >>> the translation, documentation and release teams in advance you >>> intend to make these moves - something which has also been neglected. >>> >>> For all further repository structure moves - please ensure you have >>> received the appropriate consent from the above mentioned teams, and >>> have announced them on the appropriate mailing lists in advance. >>> >>> @Plasma team: plasma-devel@kde.org does not constitute an appropriate >>> mailing list, as it is not a community wide development mailing list. >>> Only kde-devel and kde-core-devel qualify for this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben Cooksley >>> KDE Sysadmin >> >> >> My apologies, I shouldn't have rushed into doing such moves and send >> e-mails to all the interested parties. >> >> If someone considers it appropriate, I can roll some of the changes back. >> Aleix > > _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
