----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119329/#review62561 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! The reasoning is that it makes it easier for downstream to just override the desktop file as part of their customization package. - Rohan Garg On July 17, 2014, 3:20 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119329/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 17, 2014, 3:20 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma. > > > Repository: plasma-framework > > > Description > ------- > > This originates from the request of downstreams to hide packages that are > still installed. > why should be easier than not installing them i don't know, *but* > semantically I think it makes sense act as if the package was not existing > when the metadata says it's hidden > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/plasma/package.cpp 6ba7a6f > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119329/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Marco Martin > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel