----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/#review61508 -----------------------------------------------------------
+1 from me but I would like someone else to have a look at it since I am not an expert on licensing. Comparing it with the original the only difference is that copyrights doesn't match and I don't know if they should match or not. - Giorgos Tsiapaliokas On July 2, 2014, 9:28 p.m., David Suárez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 2, 2014, 9:28 p.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: plasmate > > > Description > ------- > > Use appropiate licensed files for modeltest to comply with dfsg. > > > Diffs > ----- > > plasmate/modeltest/dynamictreemodel.h 9633755 > plasmate/modeltest/dynamictreemodel.cpp fa634b6 > plasmate/modeltest/modeltest.h 52b45d9 > plasmate/modeltest/modeltest.cpp 98d707c > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119089/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Not needed, it didn't touch any code. > > > Thanks, > > David Suárez > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
