On Monday, June 30, 2014 19:55:54 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 30 June 2014, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > It's quite unfortunate the fact that we'll have a more schedule for the > > frameworks and then the workspaces won't be able to take advantage of > > those. > > > > I don't think it makes sense to decide to stop the development on a > > plasma-framework, because after-all plasma depends on many other > > frameworks > > just as well. It's random to choose Plasma just because it shares > > maintainership. > > > That's actually a good point.. > another option would be having 2 months releases for what depends from > frameworks and put as dependency the second to last framework release, not > the bleeding edge.
Why not the latest one? I don't see an advantage in restricting ourselves to older releases. We *want* people to use the latest and greatest, and I think we should mandate an up-to-date frameworks, when people are installing Plasma. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
