Aleix Pol wrote: > reports open that will render your life miserable. And this is the sentence for which I think we need the message. "We have no bugs that will make your life miserable". :)
> We want distros to package it, we just don't want people using 5.0 when 5.1 > is released, it's not very hard to understand that 5.1 will be stabler. Agreed with all. The distributions should package it. It should be an option for the people who want to install it and experiment with it. It should not be the default at this point in time. And yes, this *is* a part of the 'distribution problem' we had (apart from screwed up installations by a few of those), and a part of the message to the public. > PS: The 4.x argument is becoming KDE's own Godwin's Law. I haven't referred to 4.x as the problem. It is just easily recognizable. :P David Edmundson wrote: > We're better. Yes... we thought the same back in the day. We all used Plasma in our day-to- day workflow for everything, not only for kde development, and it was perfectly stable (for me and I guess everybody else in Plasma team) long before the release. Cheerio, Ivan KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/ gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
