On Wednesday, 2014-06-11, 15:43:34, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > > Doesn't that tie Baloo usage to exclusively Plasma? If you want it to be a > > framework, won't framework users need to configure the things in the KCM? > > Hmm, you have a point. > > I was only thinking about it from a non-kde point of view. If you want a > file indexer, you probably don't want to drag in KCMUtils. Additionally, it > would be nice to combine the (hypothetical) runners kcms with the baloo one. > > For now, lets leave the kcm in Baloo.
An alternative would be a configuration API in the framework, e.g. something like a KConfigXT generated class. Such a think would allow applications using the framework to provide UI without having to know internal config details. Basically a separation of the KCM in UI and Config API. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
