On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > One thing we all agree is that we want to keep bugzilla in a manageable > situation to avoid the plasma1 thousand bug tsunami. > > So, how to do this.. so far so good, we have 42 bugs at the moment, closed > a > ton, but now that beta is out (and even worse when the final will come out) > there will be a significant number of reports > > I am already picking some sign of the situation repeating in the form of > one > thing: old bugs of dubious reproducibility that just stay there rotting > away. > I do not want this to repeat, even if this means closing old stuff that > still > happens for somebody in very rare conditions, but if is rare, old and > there is > not a clear way to reproduce, i propose to just close > > things like > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331956 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332520 > (and many others) > > are just not helping in being there at all. > > Opinions? Comments? > This also requires the maintainers to actually attend their bugs - as well as the reporters -> reporters, especially if one of us, should constantly check if their bugs still apply and close if not anymore. Cheers -- Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
