On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, David Edmundson < da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote:
> Awesome! > > I'm not quite sure what you see the plan long term is with regards to > all the different widget methods. I want to make sure everyone on this > list is on the same page, as some options are possibly controversial. > > Is the plan to make a QStyle theme that matches this pixel for pixel > then apps will look the same despite which tech they happen to be > using (and having a proper theme will work better and faster than the > QtQuickControlsDesktop theme). > > Or is the vision to long term drop PlasmaComponents and replace it with > this. > Personally I would really support this, it's the way forwards long > term; out of the two QtQuickControls is a lot stronger in almost every > regard and end code more portable. > > Or are we trying to do both and unify the feel of workspace and apps? > > David > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > I think that the actual discussion here is what should we do with Plasma own theming system. We used to have only QStyle, then we created a thing because QML didn't offer an alternative and now we have QtQuick Controls, PlasmaTheme and QStyle. Agreeing to implement PlasmaComponents in QtQuick Controls terms (that already unifies QStyle), would be a good step forward, I think. Aleix
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
