On Tuesday 01 April 2014 13:10:42 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Martin Klapetek > > <martin.klape...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Plus the idea with "by KDE" was to be only this additional touch, it > > shouldn't really be mentioned/used as the "new name", so I'd rather > > change > > the name as "Plasma Next Alpha 1, by KDE" or similar, but not put the > > "Plasma by KDE" as the new name. > > More on this^: we used the "Glade by Brise" as an example, look at the > image: http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/440/417/440417391_640.jpg > > this is how it was intended to be used, sort of "below" the name Plasma, > the "by KDE" part should have less weight than the "Plasma" part and be > there just to keep the connection, but shouldn't be used as the new > standalone name.
After reading, I decided I agreed with you, and wrote both a short sentence in the introduction: Plasma Next is planned to be released as 2014.06 on the 17th of June. And a longer, separate one later on: A note on versioning and naming: The code name "Plasma Next" always points to the upcoming release of Plasma. The current Alpha will be 2014.06, released in June of this year. If the team opts for a 6 month release cycle (still to be determined) Plasma Next will mean 2014.12 once 2014.06 is out. Check the article and tell me what you think: http://dot.kde.org/2014/04/02/kde-releases-alpha-version-next-gen-plasma-workspace Feedback welcome. > Cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
