On Monday 25 November 2013, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > If a distribution wants to provide Plasma1 and Plasma2 at the same time, > they can just install them to different prefixes like how project neon > does it. The time span when users might want to co-install Plasma 1 and 2 > is very short. Maybe one release cycle. I don't think that it's worth the > effort to change hundreds of binaries, libraries, plugins, desktop files, > source code to locate and load plugins for this short period of time. > > Anybody who disagrees? Your arguments please :-)
will make slightly harder for distributions at start, but anyways having kde4 and what is based on frameworks coinstalled in /usr screams a little about problems anyways for me (and we can't expect every application to rename to foo5) so coinstallability -> one of the two goes in a prefix (ideally after release is the 4 stuff going there) so +1 for keeping kwin name -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
