On Wednesday 25 September 2013 12:17:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > so something like private.org.kde.plasma.widgetname or > > .org.kde.private.plasma.widgetname > > The leading . is purposeful?
ah, no ;) > > the first would take a "private" at the first level, that maybe is not too > > nice, but the nice part is that it would always be > > private.$widgetpluginname that has some beauty (and easy filtering) in it > > I'm cool with private at the beginning, I actually don't care too much, as > long as it's consistent. This has been spooking around my mind since I ship- > it'ed Bhushan's Icon port, I just like to get rid of this nagging feeling > that we have to change something there. And I'm running into the exact same > in the systray port. maybe could make sense asking in kde-core-devel as well, since i would like having other kde apps, at leastthe main ones following the scheme as well.. -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
