On Friday 23 August 2013 15:00:09 Maarten De Meyer wrote: > On 23 August 2013 10:44, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Thursday 22 August 2013 19:11:09 Martin Graesslin wrote: > >> Maybe it would even be an idea for an own (tier 0) framework which could > >> contain useful C++11 magic? I guess we will soon have more useful C++11 > >> stuff which might make sense to be used in more places. > > > > Wouldn't solve much though. The tier 1 frameworks couldn't make use of it > > because we want 3rd parties to just be able to pick them and do stuff > > immediately with no extra dependency. So that'd make by construction for > > another tier 1 framework... I'm not sure we need more of those... > > And what about putting it directly in Qt? I would like to use this in > non KDE projects.
KCoreAddons will be easily available to non KDE projects. :-) > Note: I'm not sure about the acceptance of c++11 code in Qt. I think this one would have slim chances, but yes that's another possibility indeed. I'd approach Thiago or Olivier to get their opinion first though. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
