On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Kevin Krammer <kram...@kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2013-07-17, Mark wrote: > > > True, and that argument alone lets me lean very much towards the > > KCalendar stuff. I think i'm just going to follow you on this and go > > for KCalendar and friends. It can't be that hard to port it to > > QCalendar and friends once that is released. I could also make an > > abstraction to make it to toggle between KCalendar and QCalendar > > although the later one would be a stub implementation at this moment. > > That does make it very easy to switch to a different API in the > > future. > > I don't think that abstraction is worth the effort. Currently it needs the > KDE > implementation, once ported to Qt5 its classes should be sufficient and > KDE's > one will either be deprecated or entirely removed. > > yes, the kde-workspace part anyways won't be shipped until plasma2, so that isn't a problem
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
