Okay, so we have a consent here then. Was just throwing that thing into the room to see what happens.
"Aaron J. Seigo" <ase...@kde.org> schrieb: >On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:02:28 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: >> user doesn't want them. That's one thing that always bothered me that >> Plasma always animates no matter what the system settings were. I have had > >this should mostly be supported in the standard components. plugging every bit >of code with "if (animate) then" type snippets is going to be ugly and >fragile. as such would much rather see this done in the underlying layer as >much as possible. > >when libplasma provided its own animations, guess what they did? yep, they >didn't animate when the desktop settings were set to turn animations off. >shocking! this in turn used a setting that was introduced years before in >kdelibs for such things. > >problems: > >* people who complain about these things rarely if ever put in any effort >* it's something that bothers a tiny % of people, while the vast majority of >people are *aided* by animations > >put together, it means we have a feature set that gets zero testing and has >approximately as many developers who care about it. > >so unless one of these animation haters steps up to maintain the features, i >will happily say 'no' to patches which introduce such things. > >i seriously think most people[1] who "don't like animations" should get over >it. i can't imagine how they survive in the real world where everything is >"animated" > >[1] i say most because i'm sure someone somewhere out there has a legitimate >disability that somehow comes into play > >-- >Aaron J. Seigo >_______________________________________________ >Plasma-devel mailing list >Plasma-devel@kde.org >https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
