Then it should be fixed. Should we maybe report a bug for it?
Aleix On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 18:50:24 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > > My proposal for 4.11: let's remove remote plasmoids. They don't work and > > they are a rather annoying way to annoy people around you. AFAIK they > have > > already been removed from libplasma2. > > > > Comments? > > Yes, is removed from plasma2. > Probably is a feature not used enough (as in, seems not to work but we > don't > even receive complaints about it) to be safely removed without bad > effects/regressions on users and use cases, so I would even be in favor of > this... > > But the only thing that looks "wrong" to me is that the corresponding api > in > libplasma would not be removed for api compatibility, but stay there, but > purposefully broken, this doesn't sound too much right... > > Cheers, > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
