On Thursday 10 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hello. > > we're nearly at the point of releasing 4.10. with this development cycle > very fresh in mind, it is a reasonble time to reflect on how it went. this > thread can be a place for us to do so, if we so wish. and i hope we do so > that we can improve our processes in the future. > > so how do you think 4.10 went?
mixed feelings: we did a lot, but definitely as already noted the process wasn't managed so well and the qa was not at the top (putting also myself in the blame list for that, is something that each of us shares a bit) > what do you feel are the "defining" accomplishments for the desktop > workspace in 4.10? (e.g. the positive things people will talk about when > they get 4.10 on their machines) > > what do you personally like about the results of 4.10? a *lot* has been done, qml porting is at a good stage > what, if anything, did you not like about the 4.10 development cycle? compared to the past, the process was quite confused, maybe is the nature of git, maybe is that many of us have feets in too many shoes now, but we really need to regain a lot of discipline. > what, if anything, would you like to be done the same way in 4.11? > > what, if anything, would you like to be done differently in 4.11? probably a smaller release, focused more on stability (and publishing the qml stuff that is now in branches waiting to be merged) -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
