> Personally I'm even against allowing it go in at all. It just clutters the
> code. It's not our task to cover up bugs in editors. If vim doesn't handle
> it, vim should be fixed. Also given that I'm not a vim user I would not
> know how many }}}}}} I have to place at a position or whether I have to
> change them when moving code around.
Vim doesn't *need* it to be a {{{, it can handle any other mark if you tell it
to.
For QML, there is no syntactic separator for the item groups, since the groups
don't need to be separated.
Saying that it 'hides bugs' is almost the same as saying that separating
source code into multiple files is hiding the bugs because you don't usually
open all files in a project when editing one.
> Personally I also are against the Kate settings you find in some files. If
> someone needs that, that's fine with me, but it should not end up in the
> repository.
Longer QML files would benefit from having the comments above each section.
Whether it has a special markup for folding, or not is not that important, but
doesn't hurt to have it.*
Cheerio,
Ivan
* scene_opengl.cpp from kwin can be used as a beautiful example - it has
headers which separate the files into parts that implement different classes.
--
Money can't buy happiness, but neither can poverty.
-- Leo Rosten
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
