> On Oct. 8, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff behind > > another configure dialog. Looking at the screenshot I find the design puts > > emphasis on the wrong part: what we want to remove takes more than 50 % of > > the available screen estate. > > Marco Martin wrote: > another idea would be just show the screen saver part only when the > screensaver radio is selected (i kept it a bit that way before merging btw, > seemed a bit flashy..) > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > I agree. On the other hand, showing new dialogs it's considered bad > practice. :/ > Maybe we can show the xscreensaver part when it's enabled? > > **Aleix turns the agateau-sign on** (see bat-signal for further reference) > > Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Played a bit with the .ui file and came up with this: > http://simplest-image-hosting.net/png-0-plasma-windowedk16149 . Not sure it > is possible, depends on how "previewable" the "simple locker" and "desktop > widgets" lockers are. I can provide the .ui file if you want but I butchered > it, I doubt it would compile.
It kind of makes sense to share the preview, but it seems it's not that easy to preview the plasma-overlay. Anybody knows how hard would be to invoke it in hte preview thingie? - Aleix ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/#review20087 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 8, 2012, 3:43 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 3:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma and KDE Usability. > > > Description > ------- > > After complaining about this KCM last week, I wanted to give it a try to > improve it a little. I think that the biggest stopper here is wanting to keep > the screensaver here, because we've ended up with a 3-head monster: > * simple locker > * plasma-based locker > * xscreensavers > > Since it seems it's something we may want for the moment. IMHO, we should end > up with the Plasma-based option alone. I just tried to re-organize it in a > way I like a little better. > > What I did > - I aligned the locking labels to the left, like the Form Layout suggests. It > creates a small puzzle, I'm unsure if that's a problem. > - I added toolTips and whatsThis in the locking type option buttons, so that > we can at least figure out what will happen when we lock. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kcontrol/screensaver/screensaver.ui 6524e27 > kcontrol/screensaver/scrnsave.cpp 0125620 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > just messed with it for a while. > > > Screenshots > ----------- > > result > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/s/758/ > > > Thanks, > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
