On Wednesday 03 October 2012 13:20:43 Marco Martin wrote: > it's probably just a couple of places where is used and wasn't really > documented yet (more on documentation issue later) so change would be fairly > pailess > > opinions? ideas? the krunnermodel has been part of a release, right? Given that we should not break the API, so I would suggest to go ahead with what you suggested, but in addition keep the old import around. That way maybe existing 3rd party users don't get broken.
Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
