On Wednesday 11 July 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yo all, > > I tried to port some stuff to Nepomuk2, namely kactivities and > > plasma-mobile > > > > porting kactivities went smooth, and is now in the branch mart/nepomuk2 > > of the > > kactivities repository. > > the only thing still to fix is that is exposing a Nepomuk::Resource in a > > method, so it will have to provide both that and a new one with a > > Nepomuk2::Resource > > Why both? Can't everyone just use Nepomuk2::Resource?
is released with kde 4.9 and is a public library -> binary compatibility promise (Ivan: correct me if i am wrong, that should be the only nepomuk symbol exported there?) > > > > Vishesh: what's the best way to proceed now? > > I think for now it would make sense to push your > NepomukAddOntologyClasses.cmake in that branch, and then we can merge it > into master. I don't want this going into 4.9 cause there are some problems > with the current rcgen which I would like to fix at some point. problem is that it is in kdelibs so there is no master. it may be added to nepomuk-core, but in this case since kdelibs still has to have the old one it would be called Nepomuk2AddOntologyClasses and use only nepomuk2_rcgen I'm not sure what is the policy of cmake files, if they should be scattered together their framework or if they are still wanted in a single repo > Btw, I don't really understand the NepomukAddOntologyClasses.cmake, so I > hope it works :) seems to work for both nepomuk1 and 2 cases, the issue is more where tp put the thing ;) -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
