On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 20:00:12 Simone Gaiarin wrote: > Summarizing: > 1)No redundant configuration interface should be added. > 2)Only cycle through active activity is fine, but the dbus interface
I still don't like this behaviour, as, even with a tooltip, it's still kind of hidden. A more explicit behaviour would be nicer. > should provide a method to get the list of active activity to simplify > the work, or it will be necessary to make a dbus call for every > activity to check if it is active. But what is the sense of active or > unactive activity? > 3)The tooltip popup of the widget now says: "Click to show the > activity manager". We can add a description like: "Scroll to switch > activity." > With this two changes who do not use activities can't do any mista > since the widget does not do anything even if he scroll over it. > Instead the activity aware user can know how the widget work from the > tooltip. > 4)Later, as a final improvement an osd with the activity name can be added. This is really what should be done, maybe like a kwin VD switching effect? > What do you think? I'm not a great fan of pushing in the wheel-switches-activity, this should be improved in the correct way right away. We're so far away from feature freeze (4.9) that we don't really need a quick thing in. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
