> you can add it to the feature list, however importing IconTasks itself to > kdeplasma-addons means that all things are merged. so i'd like that to be > a > (very) soft target and concentrate first on the patches ot libtaskmanager.
Yup, thats what I'd do. I'd rather have the taskmanager changes merged first - and was the reason for the email. > > it's very hard to tell from your list of features what can be merged > immediately, Features of the library, or applet? For IconTasks I'd need all features merged - but perhaps with refinement :-) As to the applet, it cant really be merged with the existing tasks applet - and would have to remain separate. > what will need refinement and what should perhaps be done in > other ways ... the only way to know that is to start going through the > patches > one by one. if you could start posting those, that would be great and we > can > get a move on the merging of libtaskmanager. :) I'll post the diff for review later, I need to strip all the debug out first! :-) > > > point, AFAIK, will be the reading of pre-existing launchers where these > are > > not mapped to a .desktop file. As I said, IconTasks does not support > this - > > and I don't think embedding the icon, etc, in the config file is a good > > idea anyway. > > and for applications which do not have a .desktop file anywhere? Then you simply cannot pin the application to the taskbar. Is that such a big deal? As a work-around the library could create a temporary .desktop file I suppose... Craig. -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
