On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 22:52:14 Marco Martin wrote: > i would say ship it (well, after is tested :p)
ok; i'll try and find the time to test it. shouldn't be too hard to do so. > how does this sound? and does seem feasible enough? i think so; it keeps backwards compatibility with a path forward for QML. being able to not use KConfigDialog in the QML case would also be a win. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
