On Monday 21 February 2011 12:55:48 Markus Slopianka wrote: > Am Montag 21 Februar 2011, 07:24:33 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > > I don't want to remove the workaround, I only do not longer want to > > expose it in the UI. That's a big difference. And I really like Markus' > > idea with the None compositing backend. > > I took a few minutes of time to squeeze out a mockup: > http://kamikazow.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kwin-mockup.png Only one comment: disabling all effects does not make sense ;-) > > To my own surprise it reduces clutter to a greater degree than I thought it > would while also not losing any features. > > As a side note: In the "All effects" tab the categories are sorted > alphabetically. While in theory that sounds good, seeing "Tools" above > "Window Management" makes no sense. "Tools" is probably no used by anyone > besides a handful of people who develop KWin and benchmarking geeks. The all effects tab is IMHO completely useless. With more than 40 effects with hardly any grouping. We need a different solution here > > I'd also merge a few effect entries that are mutually exclusive: There are > at least two Minimize effects which could be merged into one entry with > "Normal" or "Genie" as radio buttons in the effect's config window. > Same for closing windows, magnification lens, etc. Agreed, this is something the current selection does not allow. If you want to work on a concept for a new solution that would be highly appreciated.
Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
