On Friday 11 February 2011, Ted Gould wrote: > Okay, > > I think we're done discussing, so let me try and summarize to make sure > I understand (and everyone can correct me if not :) > > * Adding a field "X-KDE-StatusNotifierItems" to track the IDs of > items in the desktop files was agreed upon. Other solutions > were talked about, but this one seemed as good and relatively > simple.
abosolutely, +1 > * Adding a property for the accessible labels for the icons is > agreed upon but the spec should specifically state that if it is > not available the title of the tooltip should be used in its ok. about the name of the property: AccessibleDescription? > place. Also, the narrative text in the spec should talk about > the usage and differentiation between the two values. yes. > * KDE is not interested in having the *ShowIn fields to allow for > app developers to target specific visualizations. We should > implement this in the "XCanonical" namespace and mention that it > won't work on all implementations. yes, I'm completely fine with implementations having extensions. However, i think that would still be useful to try to identify in a more semantic way, to hide icons based on properties rather than explicity, but anyways, your call :) > If that's good I'll propose a diff to the spec for those fields. that would be really appreciated :D > Thanks everyone for the discussion and ideas! > beautiful when collaboration happens! Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
