On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 01:09, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday 05 February 2011, Jeffery MacEachern wrote: >> I agree on the call for mocks; I wonder, though, if it might be good >> to make some of the ideas discussed here more concrete (or at least, >> more well-defined), and post them as "seed" ideas when putting out the >> call. >> - Jeffery MacEachern > > from one hand could influence too much
I guess "concrete" was the wrong word. I just meant that some starting points might be nice to guide thoughts (not that they would be /requirements/ for people to follow), and that the topics in these threads would have to be cleaned up a bit before they would be suitable for that. > on the other hand could say, "yes, we want at least this minimum level of > quality" ;) That was my thought - otherwise we might get submissions of bright pink desktops with magical sparkly unicorns[0] or something crazy... ...oh wait. XD *ducks* - Jeffery MacEachern > Cheers, > Marco Martin [0]: http://www.flickr.com/photos/crashspacela/5163751400/sizes/z/in/photostream/ _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
