In the elevator pitch I miss some mention to the existing support behind the Plasma platform.
Something along the lines of "In addition to the community work, Plasma development is supported by $BIG_COMPANY_NAME", where $BIG_COMPANY_NAME currently could use the names of Nokia, Intel, AMD... for MeeGo, or some others that support KDE in general. On 19 November 2010 11:05, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, November 19, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > > another thing i would like to add, maybe as a separate page is a set > > of counterpoints on the most common objections i heard, like > > why not using just qml a big case of platform vs primitive ui toolset > > why what various kde ieces offers is not all hoverhead (i've heard > > many people screaming about duplication of stuff that we offer. is not > > as much as it seems i think) > > as you hear these, please add these questions and objections to the bottom > of > the page under the misc notes section. i'll try to work through them as i > can, > unless someone beats me to it of course. > > i'll still work on the opening arguments for a bit, but then we definitely > do > need to have answers for the common / innevitable follow up questions that > occur. > > > will look at it, however help of somebody not too tied on the > > implementation details would be helpful :D > > yep; which is why we have the promo people on the thread. already getting > some > good feedback from them :) > > -- > Aaron J. Seigo > humru othro a kohnu se > GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 > > KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
