On Saturday 21 August 2010 23:59:52 Dario Freddi wrote: > You probably remember that back in the days (I'm talking about Tokamak in > Randa) I helped Rob getting remote widgets in shape for release. This also > implied putting a private branch of QtJolie straight into libplasma, due to > the fact that the current QtJolie release did not support certain features > which were needed for remote widgets.
Well, also we still have *no* QtJolie release as I never found the time to put it in a releasable state (which I might be able to do in the next few days BTW). > I think Kevin might confirm that this is no longer true - I am not really > knowledgeable about Jolie & friends so I can't tell. Indeed, right now both branches only differ by some apidox and cmake-fu. > However, I'd really like to remove that code from kdelibs as it definitely > does not belong there. However, after a quick look at the code, I found out > that such a thing would mean having a hard dependency on QtJolie in > kdelibs. We can't have such a hard dep obviously so it'd have to be conditionally built. > So, basically I'd like to know if anybody is planning to maintain remote > widgets actively to plan what I should do. I am surely fond to learn Jolie > as I'm interested in it, so I can volunteer for at least having a better > situation than now. Although I'm obviously fine, and willing, to keep maintaining QtJolie, I'm definitely not willing to invest time in the remote widgets support per say. ENOTIME ;-) Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
