On Saturday 31 July 2010, Giulio Camuffo wrote: > In data giovedì 29 luglio 2010 21:11:05, Marco Martin ha scritto: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Giulio Camuffo <giuliocamu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In data giovedì 29 luglio 2010 18:09:10, Marco Martin ha scritto: > > >> if this works out, i would like to try it for applet handles as well > > >> in the future (in this case there wouldn't be a dependency from > > >> corona, but a DesktopContainment could set a different plugin for > > >> instance, but that's another topic). > > > > > > I'm all for the support for different handles, and it would be really > > > nice if we find out a nice API allowing to use the same handles with > > > different, developer-defined, widgets other than the Applets. > > > Currently in my containments with grouping support i have to > > > reimplement the handle to be able to use it with my groups, and i'd > > > like to find a nicer solution. > > > > yep, that was an use case i had in mind... > > i want to see how the toolbox ones turns out before really starting to > > think on that... > > but if you would like to give it a crack i'm happy to leave it to you :p > > I see two ways to do it, though i don't like so much either one :( > 1) We could modify the handle constructor to let it pass a QGraphicsWidget > instead of an Applet and then check things like > hasConfigurationInterface() using the property() method. Still it would > remain the problem of emitting the appletTransformedByUser() signal, but > maybe we could workaround that.
why souldn't be an Applet? the problem is your containment? Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
