On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org> wrote:
> On April 29, 2010, Aleix Pol wrote: > > Does it make a difference? > > not so much from the libplasma side. but sharing config files is a great > way > to lead to unexpected naming collisions. if avoidable, that would be nice. > > if it isn't possible, then we probably want to look into being able to > define > the KConfigBase to use so that a KConfigGroup group can be passed in, > giving > some automatic scoping inside the config file and avoiding any possibility > of > naming collisions later on. > > -- > Aaron J. Seigo > humru othro a kohnu se > GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 > > KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > plasma-de...@kde.orgi' > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > Having a prefix would be great. We can also enforce some prefix from the kdevelop side, this config files usage right now is very limited now so I'm not much concerned of this namespacing effect even if I understand the risk and I'd love to be able to forget about it :). Actually, IIRC it's possible to have groups inside groups in KConfig files so this would be another way to separe :). Thanks! Aleix
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
