On Sunday 04 April 2010 22:24:11 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On April 4, 2010, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > Is the current Kephal API correct ? > > i haven't done a thorough API review of it myself. using it has been quite > straightforward.
The only parts of Kephal currently in use are the Screens API and its associated ScreenUtils helper, though. > there are some small things missing still, though, like > being able to get the available screen geometry using a Kephal screen id. > right now we have to go back to KWindowSystem for that; and while it > works, it feels a bit inconsistent to have to mix Kephal and KWindwoSystem > calls. I think that should be possible using Kephal's Output class. Can you point me to somewhere in the code where these are mixed > > What Aike said seems ok but it has to be well documented so people don't > > mix everything up. > > yes.. Note, I've just committed a fundamental reorganisation of the Kephal sources to make the code easier to understand. The build result is the same though. I've started to add some API docs and notes as I work through the code and get my head around it. Will _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
